Europeans and Disease: 
  Allies in Conquering Continents  
  Chinese proverb claims that the rat is the most clever and strongest survivor 
  of all animals. The rat proved itself in the beginning of time when god held 
  a race for all of his animals; the rat was clever enough to hide in the ear 
  of a large beast, and at the last second he leapt out of the beast's ear and 
  crossed the finish line before the beast. Disease tells a similar history, in 
  which it has been able to spread itself through out the entire world, through 
  the naïve and unknowing help of humans and animals.
  Earlier in history, Europe seemed to be an epicenter for disease. This was rooted 
  in the fact that the Europeans, more so than any other population, lived intimately 
  with their livestock. Farmers and the surrounding aggregate nations survived 
  harsh winters and hot summers where it was necessary to share indoor space with 
  animals. Additionally, they had excessive contact with them and little understanding 
  of what hubs of nastiness their fury friends were or what control centers for 
  disease they themselves would become. Humans have historically shown a deep 
  affinity for livestock and continue to do so, currently, in New Zealand there 
  are more sheep kept than there are people on the island. In fact, in some cases, 
  people seemed to have developed such a tenderness for their animals that they 
  resort to practicing bestiality. Several common human diseases are closely related 
  to animal diseases. Smallpox developed from cowpox and measles is closely related 
  to rinderpest (another bovine disease). But whether it is through cuddling, 
  milking or whipping our animals, we have managed to remain intimately involved 
  over the centuries; and disease has lovingly appreciated it by spreading itself 
  far and wide. 
  The populations of the American continents however, did not experience the same 
  spread of disease that the Europeans did. They kept almost no domestic animals. 
  Consequently, their immune systems had few antibodies developed to combat even 
  the weakest strings of disease. Also, they did not live in crowds the way that 
  Europeans did. Early in the middle ages the Europeans had not only settled and 
  become dependent on their agriculture and livestock, but they had developed 
  large cities like London where thousands of people lived in close quarters, 
  and had given little thought to the disposal of waste. Native Americans did 
  live in tribes but did not have permanent living quarters that compared to the 
  size of some of the European cities. In fact, most of the tribes that lived 
  in the Midwest were migratory, moving for the winter season. Their constant 
  movement, small numbers and lack of exposure to livestock made it difficult 
  for any crowd disease to develop or have a devastating impact on their population. 
  It is hypothesized however, that the Aztecs (who lived on the American continent) 
  were possibly wiped out by crowd disease, whether this included exposure to 
  Europeans or not is unclear, nothing can be known for sure.
  Consequently, when the Europeans arrived in the America's, disease was their 
  greatest weapon. Smallpox in particular had devastating effects on the indigenous 
  people. Unfamiliar with the phenomenon of crowd diseases, the Native Americans 
  knew none of the tricks that the Europeans had been quickly learning, like containment. 
  During the Bubonic Plague which caused its first devastating outbreak in Europe 
  in 1346, houses were nailed shut with victims in them and parts of cities were 
  burned in an attempt to tame the ravaging disease. 
  Asia however, did not suffer the same fate that the Americas did. In fact, Asia 
  is the continent that gave Europe the Bubonic Plague, or Black Death. It was 
  spread by flees that hung onto rats that traveled from continent to continent 
  in cargo ships. The extensive trade between Asia and Europe allowed us to spread 
  almost all of our diseases over the spread of time, especially as the Silk Road 
  became more developed and traveled.
  The Asians had a much better understanding of sanitation than the Europeans 
  during the Middle Ages. Asians bathed themselves on a regular basis and had 
  a fairly strong foundation and understanding or herbal medicines. Not only did 
  Europeans not bathe themselves on a regular basis, but they paid little attention 
  to their drinking water, giving cholera an open door to spread itself. An example 
  of poor sanitation directly resulting in death or illness is the hairstyle of 
  European women in the sixteenth and seventeenth century. Women used to wear 
  their hair on the top of their heads and then have wigs fitted over their hair, 
  occasionally women developed such horrendous lice infestations that their heads 
  became nests to other insects as well, including nats, which would sometimes 
  burrow into their scalp, lay eggs and kill them. 
  World trade routes were the solidifying factor for the spread or microbes. Once 
  Asia, Europe and North Africa had ban together they ultimately meshed their 
  worlds into one giant breeding ground for bacteria. Agriculture continued to 
  assist in the spread using animal and human feces as fertilizer. But at the 
  same time, developments in medicine and better sanitation, along with better 
  diets and eating habits, strengthened humans to fight the mass crowd diseases.
  Europe however, was not only given the gift of disease. There were several strange 
  circumstances that allowed them to flourish throughout the world. First off, 
  they had more large mammals after the first ice age which they were able to 
  domesticate and use for Africa etc. But most importantly, they had a monotheistic 
  religion which allowed them to be self prophesized. Through this came the development 
  and burst of capitalism, for which nothing could be stopped. The greediness 
  and neediness that capitalism created allowed them to spread at any cost. And 
  travel they did, European's made an effort to conquer the world. They developed 
  an insatiable curiosity for the unknown, which extended far beyond the boundaries 
  of their own reality, both geographically and mentally. 
  Through human travel, the populations of humans have been heavily affected and 
  in turn have had effects on wild life and its surrounding environment. Disease, 
  however, is the main reason that travel has had such a devastating impact. 
  
Return
to ENVS2 homepage
Send message to 
Swarthmore College Environmental Studies
last updated 2/6/03
webmaster